A bush tucker food native to the Northern Territory and Western Australia has raised the interest of a major US cosmetics giant. Last year Mary Kay cosmetics applied for an international patent on the Kakadu Plum extract to be used in skin care products. Traditionally used for food and medicine by the Mirrar people of Kakadu, this patent would create a monopoly of use for Mary Kay for up to the next 20 years. There is concern about this patent application as it may limit future use of similar extracts and indeed may exclude the use of Kakadu Plum in existing cosmetic products. The application had also angered some indigenous people as it doesn’t take into account any benefit sharing for traditional use of the plum.
Also known as Billygoat plum, the round, light green fruits are usually eaten raw or made into jam. The fruits gained increased popularity after the vitamin C content became known. Significantly the Kakadu Plum has been identified world wide as the single natural food source with the highest vitamin C content on the planet. It contains up to 3000mg of vitamin C per 100g of fruit, which is over 50 times the concentration found in oranges. In addition high levels of folate and polyphenolic antioxidants were also found.
Unfortunately, supply of high-vitamin C content Kakadu Plum may be limited. Antioxidant levels including vitamin C respond to harsh growing conditions and rise when the plant is under environmental threat which is common in wild stands of trees. Plantation crops of the fruit have lower levels of vitamin C due to irrigation and less harsh growing conditions.
The vitamin C content in particular explains why it Kakadu Plum has gained the recent interest of Mary Kay. Among other benefits Vitamin C – supports and stimulates collagen synthesis and reduces free radical damage. Significantly in the Australian climate, it also minimised photoaging. Photo-aging damage includes but is not limited to: wrinkles, dark blotches, freckles, leathery texture and loss of elasticity.
This exceptional extract can be found in the Mukti range, in particular their newly reformulated Nourishing Facial Cream as well as the divine Kakadu Plum & Honey Gel Hydrating Mask.
Twitter It!How can we stop this sort of thing happening? It would be appalling if any company, let alone a foreign one, gained control of an indigenous Australian resource – it should be there for everyone to benefit, especially the indigenous people for whom it is still an important food resource.
[Reply]
I used to think that you couldn’t patent any plant extract in it’s unaltered form, otherwise all herbal tinctures would be at threat from this. Surely they would have to modify or add something to it to patent a kakadu plum extract.
Or maybe there’s some loophole somewhere as this sounds very much like what our govt agency CALM did, they sold out the rights to one of the Smoke Bush species here in WA to a US Cancer Pharmaceutical company…don’t know how they got away with that.
[Reply]
I would just like to see some sort of a vote taken on whether Mary Kay has the right to put a patent on something that does not belong to ‘her’ exclusively, if anyone has the right to call it theirs I would suggest it belongs to the original people of this land, and have used this for many years for different things – and no I am not indigenous! I would be putting my name to a NO vote if the opportunity was made available….
[Reply]
I am a little upset and not at all shocked that a large company wants to dominate something so naturally beneficial and unique to Americans. Unfortunately, that is the name of the game with our competitive large cosmetic companies. In America, it is a race to find the best raw materials that have the most benefit before the American public saturates the market and then try to prevent any other competitors with patents, lawyers, etc. Usually by any means necessary. I feel ashamed of this as an American. i hope that this doesn’t go through for your sake as Australians. Otherwise, where will it end?
[Reply]
vitale Reply:
February 7th, 2011 at 9:51 pm
Hi Karen – I thought the same about plant extracts. The patents on most plant extracts to date (as far as I know) have actually been about the method of extraction rather than the plant extract itself which is why this is different. And also outrageous! I suspect (fingers crossed) that Mary Kay Cosmetics will have a fight on its hands.
[Reply]